Review



mscohere function in  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc mscohere function in
    Mscohere Function In, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mscohere+function/pmc12215278-512-13-16
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mscohere function in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Olfactory epithelium electrical stimulation mitigates memory and synaptic deficits caused by mechanical ventilation.
    Article Snippet: To analyze coherence spectra between two regions, we utilized the MATLAB’s mscohere function.

    Article Title: Guided visual search is associated with target boosting and distractor suppression in early visual cortex
    Article Snippet: This interval was chosen to avoid confounds with the broadband gamma response to the onset of the display Fig. . For each window, coherence between the MEG and RIFT signal was estimated based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT; zero-padded to 512 samples), and averaged over all windows to obtain one coherence value per trial (as implemented by the mscohere function in MATLAB).

    Article Title: The effects of fear conditioning and spatial separation on the coherence of the responses to deep superior colliculus stimulation in awake male rats.
    Article Snippet: This study explored how fear conditioning and perceptual spatial separation affect the neural responses to target stimuli in the deep layers of the superior colliculus (deepSC) of awake rats.. After electrodes were surgically implanted in the bilateral deepSC of all rats and a habituation period was completed, pre-fear conditioning tests, fear conditioning and conditioning control procedures, and post-fear conditioning tests were conducted in the awake state.. The results showed that under the condition of perceptual spatial separation, fear conditioning significantly increased the stimulus–response coherence (S-R coherence) of the fine structure in the contralateral deepSC.

    Article Title: Comparable neural and behavioural performance in dominant and non-dominant hands during grasping tasks.
    Article Snippet: Coherence was calculated between each EEG channel (14 channels) and each EMG channel (FDS and FCU) using the mscohere function in MATLAB’s Signal Processing Toolbox.

    Article Title: Effects of blood flow restriction on motoneurons synchronization
    Article Snippet: To assess coherence, we calculated the magnitude-squared coherence using Welchs overlapped averaged periodogram method via MATLAB's mscohere function with a 1 s Hanning window with 50% overlap.

    Article Title: Modulation of Motor Unit Recruitment Threshold and Common Synaptic Inputs in Triceps Surae Muscles: Effects of Ankle Position.
    Article Snippet: Using “mscohere” function in 231 MATLAB, coherence was estimated with Welch’s averaged periodogram with a non-232 overlapping Hanning window of 1 s duration (21, 45).

    Modification:

    Article Title: Atypical audio-visual neural synchrony and speech processing in early autism.
    Article Snippet: .. We assessed individual responses to speech envelope and visual motion by computing magnitude-squared coherence for each trial and electrode using the mscohere function in Matlab, applying Welch’s averaged modified periodogram method. ..



    Similar Products

    mscohere function in  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc mscohere function in
    Mscohere Function In, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mscohere+function/pmc12215278-512-13-16
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mscohere function in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mscohere function  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc mscohere function
    a (left) Topographic representation of the 60 Hz <t>RIFT</t> signal (uncombined planar gradiometers), averaged over participants in the 0.1–0.5 s interval ( t = 0 s is the onset of the search display). The RIFT response is confined to the occipital sensors. (right) Source modelling demonstrates that the RIFT response was primarily generated in the early visual cortex. The source grid has been masked to show the 1% most strongly activated grid points (MNI coordinates [0 −92 −4]). b Grand average spectrum, obtained by averaging over the participant-specific sensors of interest, indicating peaks at the 60 and 67 Hz stimulation frequency. c Grand average of the time-frequency representation of coherence between <t>the</t> <t>MEG</t> sensors and the RIFT signal, demonstrating an early, unspecific response in the gamma-band, followed by narrow-band responses at the stimulation frequency. d Set size 16. The responses to the distractor colour are significantly reduced for guided compared to unguided search ( p < 0.05; multiple comparison controlled using a cluster-based permutation test in the 0.1–0.5 s interval). There is no evidence for target boosting for this set size. e Set size 32. The RIFT responses to the guided target colour are significantly enhanced and the responses to the guided distractor colour are significantly reduced compared to the unguided search condition ( p < 0.05; cluster-based permutation test).
    Mscohere Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mscohere+function/pmc12159186-84-28-62
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mscohere function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    magnitude-squared coherence function mscohere  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc magnitude-squared coherence function mscohere
    a (left) Topographic representation of the 60 Hz <t>RIFT</t> signal (uncombined planar gradiometers), averaged over participants in the 0.1–0.5 s interval ( t = 0 s is the onset of the search display). The RIFT response is confined to the occipital sensors. (right) Source modelling demonstrates that the RIFT response was primarily generated in the early visual cortex. The source grid has been masked to show the 1% most strongly activated grid points (MNI coordinates [0 −92 −4]). b Grand average spectrum, obtained by averaging over the participant-specific sensors of interest, indicating peaks at the 60 and 67 Hz stimulation frequency. c Grand average of the time-frequency representation of coherence between <t>the</t> <t>MEG</t> sensors and the RIFT signal, demonstrating an early, unspecific response in the gamma-band, followed by narrow-band responses at the stimulation frequency. d Set size 16. The responses to the distractor colour are significantly reduced for guided compared to unguided search ( p < 0.05; multiple comparison controlled using a cluster-based permutation test in the 0.1–0.5 s interval). There is no evidence for target boosting for this set size. e Set size 32. The RIFT responses to the guided target colour are significantly enhanced and the responses to the guided distractor colour are significantly reduced compared to the unguided search condition ( p < 0.05; cluster-based permutation test).
    Magnitude Squared Coherence Function Mscohere, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mscohere+function/pm40440290-110-5-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    magnitude-squared coherence function mscohere - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    coherence estimate function (mscohere)  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc coherence estimate function (mscohere)
    a (left) Topographic representation of the 60 Hz <t>RIFT</t> signal (uncombined planar gradiometers), averaged over participants in the 0.1–0.5 s interval ( t = 0 s is the onset of the search display). The RIFT response is confined to the occipital sensors. (right) Source modelling demonstrates that the RIFT response was primarily generated in the early visual cortex. The source grid has been masked to show the 1% most strongly activated grid points (MNI coordinates [0 −92 −4]). b Grand average spectrum, obtained by averaging over the participant-specific sensors of interest, indicating peaks at the 60 and 67 Hz stimulation frequency. c Grand average of the time-frequency representation of coherence between <t>the</t> <t>MEG</t> sensors and the RIFT signal, demonstrating an early, unspecific response in the gamma-band, followed by narrow-band responses at the stimulation frequency. d Set size 16. The responses to the distractor colour are significantly reduced for guided compared to unguided search ( p < 0.05; multiple comparison controlled using a cluster-based permutation test in the 0.1–0.5 s interval). There is no evidence for target boosting for this set size. e Set size 32. The RIFT responses to the guided target colour are significantly enhanced and the responses to the guided distractor colour are significantly reduced compared to the unguided search condition ( p < 0.05; cluster-based permutation test).
    Coherence Estimate Function (Mscohere), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mscohere+function/pm40252875-150-8-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    coherence estimate function (mscohere) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a (left) Topographic representation of the 60 Hz RIFT signal (uncombined planar gradiometers), averaged over participants in the 0.1–0.5 s interval ( t = 0 s is the onset of the search display). The RIFT response is confined to the occipital sensors. (right) Source modelling demonstrates that the RIFT response was primarily generated in the early visual cortex. The source grid has been masked to show the 1% most strongly activated grid points (MNI coordinates [0 −92 −4]). b Grand average spectrum, obtained by averaging over the participant-specific sensors of interest, indicating peaks at the 60 and 67 Hz stimulation frequency. c Grand average of the time-frequency representation of coherence between the MEG sensors and the RIFT signal, demonstrating an early, unspecific response in the gamma-band, followed by narrow-band responses at the stimulation frequency. d Set size 16. The responses to the distractor colour are significantly reduced for guided compared to unguided search ( p < 0.05; multiple comparison controlled using a cluster-based permutation test in the 0.1–0.5 s interval). There is no evidence for target boosting for this set size. e Set size 32. The RIFT responses to the guided target colour are significantly enhanced and the responses to the guided distractor colour are significantly reduced compared to the unguided search condition ( p < 0.05; cluster-based permutation test).

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Guided visual search is associated with target boosting and distractor suppression in early visual cortex

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08321-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a (left) Topographic representation of the 60 Hz RIFT signal (uncombined planar gradiometers), averaged over participants in the 0.1–0.5 s interval ( t = 0 s is the onset of the search display). The RIFT response is confined to the occipital sensors. (right) Source modelling demonstrates that the RIFT response was primarily generated in the early visual cortex. The source grid has been masked to show the 1% most strongly activated grid points (MNI coordinates [0 −92 −4]). b Grand average spectrum, obtained by averaging over the participant-specific sensors of interest, indicating peaks at the 60 and 67 Hz stimulation frequency. c Grand average of the time-frequency representation of coherence between the MEG sensors and the RIFT signal, demonstrating an early, unspecific response in the gamma-band, followed by narrow-band responses at the stimulation frequency. d Set size 16. The responses to the distractor colour are significantly reduced for guided compared to unguided search ( p < 0.05; multiple comparison controlled using a cluster-based permutation test in the 0.1–0.5 s interval). There is no evidence for target boosting for this set size. e Set size 32. The RIFT responses to the guided target colour are significantly enhanced and the responses to the guided distractor colour are significantly reduced compared to the unguided search condition ( p < 0.05; cluster-based permutation test).

    Article Snippet: This interval was chosen to avoid confounds with the broadband gamma response to the onset of the display Fig. . For each window, coherence between the MEG and RIFT signal was estimated based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT; zero-padded to 512 samples), and averaged over all windows to obtain one coherence value per trial (as implemented by the mscohere function in MATLAB).

    Techniques: Generated, Comparison

    a (left, top) The coherence between the signal-trial MEG data and RIFT signal was quantified using a sliding-window FFT approach, whereby the coherence was estimated by averaging over the 0.1 s in the 0.2–0.5 s interval (moved in steps of 0.025 s). (left, bottom) The topography of the coherence (combined planar gradiometers) suggests a response in the occipital sensors. (right) The RIFT response to the target and distractor was then concatenated into one vector, and submitted to a GLM with the factors target colour (T), unguided (U), distractor colour (D), and time-on-task (tot). b The contrast between the regressors associated with the target colour and unguided, and between distractor colour and unguided, was compared to 0 using a cluster-based permutation test (5000 permutations). The model fitted to the set size 16 conditions yielded no significant results but suggested reduced responses for distractors compared to unguided stimuli ( p = 0.08). c The model fitted to the set size 32 conditions replicated the magnitude-squared coherence results reported above, with a significantly stronger response to the target colour compared to unguided and a significantly reduced response to the distractor colour.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Guided visual search is associated with target boosting and distractor suppression in early visual cortex

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08321-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a (left, top) The coherence between the signal-trial MEG data and RIFT signal was quantified using a sliding-window FFT approach, whereby the coherence was estimated by averaging over the 0.1 s in the 0.2–0.5 s interval (moved in steps of 0.025 s). (left, bottom) The topography of the coherence (combined planar gradiometers) suggests a response in the occipital sensors. (right) The RIFT response to the target and distractor was then concatenated into one vector, and submitted to a GLM with the factors target colour (T), unguided (U), distractor colour (D), and time-on-task (tot). b The contrast between the regressors associated with the target colour and unguided, and between distractor colour and unguided, was compared to 0 using a cluster-based permutation test (5000 permutations). The model fitted to the set size 16 conditions yielded no significant results but suggested reduced responses for distractors compared to unguided stimuli ( p = 0.08). c The model fitted to the set size 32 conditions replicated the magnitude-squared coherence results reported above, with a significantly stronger response to the target colour compared to unguided and a significantly reduced response to the distractor colour.

    Article Snippet: This interval was chosen to avoid confounds with the broadband gamma response to the onset of the display Fig. . For each window, coherence between the MEG and RIFT signal was estimated based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT; zero-padded to 512 samples), and averaged over all windows to obtain one coherence value per trial (as implemented by the mscohere function in MATLAB).

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation